The
Congressional Budget Office (CBO) last week released an updated report
on the nation's budget and economic outlook that comments on a number of
health care policy issues. First, the CBO says that if another
physician payment "fix" is enacted by Congress (as has happened every
year since 2003), then spending on Medicare could be significantly more
than the amount projected in CBO's baseline. Under current law, Medicare
physician payments rates are scheduled to be reduced, but if those
rates stayed the same through 2021 then Medicare outlays over the next 10 years
would be $300 billion more than projected. The CBO also estimates that
federal Medicaid spending will increase by less than 1 percent this
year, compared to an average annual increase of 8 percent between 2000
and 2009. The slowdown is due to the expiration of increased federal
assistance to the states for Medicaid in 2009 and 2010. Finally, CBO is
anticipating a one-year delay in the implementation of the Community
Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) Program created under
the Affordable Care Act (ACA). CBO projects the program won't begin
collecting premiums until 2013. Some in Congress have called for repeal
of the ACA provision creating the CLASS program because of its long-term
cost.
Seamless interfacing of the eligibility system for Medicaid recipients,
particularly the population impacted by the coverage expansion
Credentials of Navigators (requiring more from community groups to avoid broker dominance)
Parameters to constrain states from using flexibility as a guise to retreat from ACA requirements
Improved foreign language translations of the material on the HHS website
Stricter scrutiny of exchange board membership
Alignment of Medicaid eligibility/enrollment rules with an exchange open enrollment period
Integrating the exchanges with other public service agencies
Requiring all carriers to contract with essential service providers
Joel
Ario, Director, Office of Health Insurance Exchanges, remarked that the
overarching goal of the exchanges was to expand consumer protections
through greater transparency. His response to concerns about adverse
selection was to point to the availability of the "young invincible"
policy and the "3 Rs" -- risk adjustment, risk corridors and reinsurance
-- as solutions. Regarding the potential for exchange products to not
be affordable, Ario said the goal of the exchanges is solely to expand
access and that the cost issue will be addressed by exchanges becoming
"active purchasers".CALIFORNIA: As expected, consumer groups are
threatening to push for a measure on the November 2012 ballot that would
let voters decide on whether rate regulation of health insurance
premiums should be allowed. Consumer groups plan to prepare the ballot
language and submit the measure to the state Attorney General by
November. Then the group will start collecting the 700,000 signatures
necessary to qualify for the ballot. Exactly what the ballot language
would require is not yet known, but it would likely look similar to
legislation currently pending in the legislature. The legislation would
require prior approval of all health insurance rates, payment of
intervener fees, approval of employer benefit design changes and rate
rollbacks. Consumer groups seem to be turning their attention toward a
potential ballot measure rather than the legislative vehicle since the
bill has come under strong opposition from not only health insurers and
business groups but also CalPERS, the League of Cities and the State
Department of Finance.
In other news, the California Health
Exchange Board selected Peter Lee as its Executive Director. Most
recently Lee was deputy director for the Center for Medicare and
Medicaid Innovation at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Lee previously served as executive director and CEO of the Pacific
Business Group on Health. That role is similar to the one that the
exchange is expected to play on behalf of individuals and small
businesses.IDAHO: The legislature's interim Health Care Task Force met
last week to address issues that include federal health care reform and
the future Idaho Health Insurance Exchange. Despite his hostility toward
federal health care reform and his executive order prohibiting many
activities that would implement the ACA, Governor C.L. "Butch" Otter
indicated that the state would continue efforts to establish an
exchange. Otter argued in support of the state's acceptance of federal
grant money to establish the exchange, stating that Idaho could see the
loss of significant federal funds without quick action. Otter pointed
out that failure to establish a state-based exchange would devastate
health insurance agents in the state and would allow the federal
government to dictate health insurance policy for Idaho. Noting that he
does not need approval from the task force or legislature to apply for
the grant money, the governor indicated that he had made the decision to
pursue federal funds for an exchange.
Following the governor, representatives from the Idaho Department of
Health and Welfare (Richard Armstrong, Director) and the Idaho
Department of Insurance (Bill Deal, Director) made the case that action
is necessary to address unsustainably high health care costs and
inefficiencies in the marketplace. Specifically, they argued that
operating the exchange at the state level allows the state to continue
to govern the market, decide which carriers participate and pursue
state-specific policies to assure competition and choice. According to
regulators, the planning process for the exchange is underway and has
thus far focused on obtaining stakeholder input and developing
background research. Armstrong and Deal pointed to four potential
courses of action for the state: apply for funding for an Idaho
exchange; wait for lawmakers to decide options for an exchange;
return/accept funding for an Idaho exchange based on state decisions;
and decline to pursue additional federal grants, forfeiting the
opportunity to decide on an exchange at a later date.MICHIGAN: A 1.0
percent medical claims tax has
passed both houses of the legislature and is now headed to Governor Rick
Snyder for his signature. Having originated the idea in the
Administration's initial budget, the governor is fully expected to sign
it. The tax replaces the existing 6 percent tax on the state's Medicaid
HMOs and the $1.2 billion it raises for the Medicaid program. The law
allows for a maximum of $400 million to be collected from the medical claims
tax, which would permit the state to receive another $800 million in
federal matching Medicaid dollars for calendar years 2012 and 2013.
Silagra |
No comments:
Post a Comment